A Comprehensive Review Is Essential in Plastic Surgery
Systematic reviews are critical for determining the quality of research in a certain field. They apply rigorous scientific methodologies and consider all studies to reduce research bias. Planning entails developing rigorous pre-specified processes and a PICO methodology (population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes). It also requires careful study selection. The most rigorous approach to gathering evidence is systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses. Nonetheless, the trustworthiness of primary research and the mechanism employed to pool data might increase their quality. To examine the overall quality of SRs published in three renowned plastic surgery journals between July 2019 and July 2020, we used A Measuring Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews to critically appraise their reporting requirements (AMSTAR). We also looked at the elements that affect the underlying methodology of these reports. There must be a more significant disparity in SR quality between plastic surgery and o...